Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research in the garden: Averting the collections crisis

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Botanic gardens and arboreta are a vibrant part of the natural history collections community, serving society in areas such as education, recreation, and research. Unfortunately, at the present time dwindling support and advocacy for collections-based reissued search has placed these institutions in the midst of a collections crisis. In this review, I assess the historical importance of living plant collections in supporting research, examine why their research potential is currently unmet, and provide a series of rationales in support of collections-based research. To avert this crisis several things must occur, the most basic of which is stronger advocacy for living collections and the research derived from them. Traditional views of collections management need to be evaluated under new light and the pool of researchers expanded. Formal, on-site programs are not required for collections to be used for research, as off-site scientists can make great contributions. Toward this end, collaborative links between the garden and research communities ought to be enhanced through the pivotal role played by curators and collections managers. Investment in data-management systems are also required to increase collection value and improve the ability to disseminate information to researchers who require it. If provided the necessary leadership and support, living plant collections have great potential to meet future scientific needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alienstein, P. &K. Conrad. 2004. National Plant Germplasm System and North American Plant Collections Consortium: a decade of collaboration. Public Gard. 19(3): 14–16, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkworth, M.E. &S.W.L. Jacobs. 2001. Valuable research or short stories: what makes the difference? Hereditas 135(2–3): 263–270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, F.A. 2001. Plant biology in the future. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(10): 5441–5445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentz, J. &A. M. Townsend. 2004. Spatial and temporal patterns of abundance of the potato leafhopper among red maples. Ann. Appl. Biol. 145(2): 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharjee, Y. 2005. Citizen scientists supplement work of Cornell researchers. Science 308: 1402–1403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bojarczuk, K. 1982. Propagation of magnolias by softwood cuttings using different substrates for stimulation of rooting. Arbor. Kornickie 27: 169–185.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, G. &W. McDevitt. 1989. Dream a little before you pick up that shovel... Public Gard. 4(1): 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinker, A.M. &I. Raskin. 2005. Determination of triptolide in root extracts ofTripterygium wilfordii by solid-phase extraction and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1070(1–2): 65–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J.M. 1983. Biological collections: legacy or liability? Curator 26(3): 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C.R. &R.D. Marquard. 1999. Accelerated propagation ofChionanthus virginicus via embryo culture. HortScience 34(1): 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, E. &M.R. Pooler. 2003. Micropropagation of Chinese redbud (Cercis yunnanensis) through axillary bud breaking and induction of adventitious shoots from leaf pieces. In Vitro Cell. Developmental Biol., Plant 39(5): 455–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., D.D. Keck & W.M. Hiesey. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. The effects of varied environments on North American Plants. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication Number 520, Washington, D.C.

  • Cook, R.E. 2006. Botanical collections as a resource for research. Public Gard. 21(1): 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubey, R. &D. Rae. 1999. PlantNet directory of botanical collections in Britain and Ireland. PlantNet, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. 2003. Natural history collections in crisis as funding is slashed. Nature 423(6940): 575.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Tredici, P. &A. Kitajima. 2004. Introduction and cultivation of Chinese hemlock (Tsuga chinensis) and its resistance to hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae). J. Aboric. 30(5): 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &J. Li. 2002.Stewartia ‘Scarlet Sentinel’. HortScience 37(2): 412–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarie, E.T., III. 1996. The value of plant collections. Public Gard. 11(2): 7, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosmann, M.S. 2002. Stratification improves and is likely required for germination ofAconitum sinomontanum. HortTechnol. 12(3): 423–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &P. Del Tredici. 2003. Plant introduction, distribution, and survival: a case study of the 1980 Sino-American Botanical Expedition. BioScience 53(6): 588–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 2005. The Sino-American Botanical Expedition of 1980: a retrospective analysis of success. HortScience 40(2): 302–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, T. S. 1991. About this issue. Public Gard. 6(3): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. R. Pooler. 2004. The identity of the African firebush (Hamelia) in the ornamental nursery trade. HortScience 39(6): 1224–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, J.M.M. &L. Visser. 2003. Genebank management procedures. Pp. 60–79in J.M.M. Engels and L. Visser (eds.), A guide to effective management of germplasm collections. IPGRI Handbooks for Genebanks No. 6. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertter, B. 2000. Our undiscovered heritage: past and future prospects for species-level botanical inventory. Madroño 47: 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, H.L. 1974. Phenology and genecology of woody plants. Pp. 83–97in H. Leith (ed.), Phenology and seasonality modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. A. &J. R. Runkle. 2000. Mortality and replacement patterns of an old-growthAcer-Fagus woods in the Holden Arboretum, northeastern Ohio. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 144(2): 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, G. 2000. The changing nature of museums. Curator 43(4): 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C.H., S. Ferrier, F. Huettman, C. Moritz &A. T. Peterson. 2004. New developments in museum-based informatics and applications in biodiversity analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(9): 497–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griesbach, R.J. &F. S. Santamour. 2003. Anthocyanins in cones ofAbies, Picea, Pinus, Pseudotsuga andTsuga (Pinaceae). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 31(3): 261–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, M. P. 2004. The origins of an important cactus crop,Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Amer. J. Bot. 91(11): 1915–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gropp, R.E. 2003. Are university natural science collections going extinct? BioScience 53(6): 550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havens, K., E. O. Guerrant Jr.,P. Vitt &M. Maunder. 2004. Conservation research and public gardens. Public Gard. 19(3): 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,P. Vitt, M. Maunder, E. O. Guerrant Jr. &K. Dixon. 2006. Ex situ plant conservation and beyond. BioScience 56: 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, I. 1995. Science in the pleasure ground: a history of the Arnold Arboretum. Northeastern Univ. Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J.J., J.D. Aber, K.J. Nadelhoffer &R.D. Hallett. 2000. Nitrogen controls on fine root substrate quality in temperate forest ecosystems. Ecosystems 3(1): 57–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyning, J.E. 2004. The future of natural history collections. Collections 1(1): 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H. 1995. A global strategy for the conservation of plant diversity. Grana 34(6): 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibben, C.R. &L.M. Franzen. 1989. Susceptibility of lilacs to mycoplasmalike organisms. J. Environm. Hort. 7(4): 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans, R. J., M. Schreuder, J. De la Cruz &L. Guarino. 1999. Using GIS to check co-ordinates of genebank accessions. Genet. Resources Crop Evol. 46(3): 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving, A. &J. Ambers. 2002. Hidden treasure from the Royal Cemetery at Ur: technology sheds new light on the ancient Near East. Near E. Archaeol. 65(3): 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janick, J. 2004. Caravaggio’s fruit: a mirror on Baroque horticulture. Chron. Hort. 44(4): 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, L., K. Havens &J. Ault. 2004. Implementing invasive screening procedures: the Chicago Botanic Garden model. Weed Technol. 18: 1434–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, D.T., Q.-Y. Xiang, V.E. Stirm, A.M. Shirazi &E.N. Ashworth. 2004. Phylogenetic analyses inCornus substantiate ancestry of xylem supercooling freezing behavior and reveal lineage of desiccation related proteins. P1. Physiol. 135: 1654–1665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K. 2004. Twenty years of ex situ plant conservation. Public Gard. 19(3): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, J. A., P. S. Soltis &S. J. Brunsfeld. 2001. Genetic diversity and tests of the hybrid origin of the endangered yellow larkspur. Conservation Biol. 15(6): 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, S.-L. &M.-D. Wilson. 2002. Resistance toPhytophthora root rot in contemporary rhododendron cultivars. HortScience 37(5): 790–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishtalka, L. &P.S. Humphrey. 2000. Can natural history museums capture the future? BioScience 50:611–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivtsov, V., R. Watling, S. Walker, D. Knott, J. Palfreyman &H. Staines. 2003. Analysis of fungal fruiting patterns at the Dawyck Botanic Garden. Ecol. Modelling 170(2–3): 393–4106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, F.E. &W.C. Sullivan. 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city—does vegetation reduce crime? Environm. Behav. 33(3): 343–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. A. 1996. Roles of natural history collections. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 83(4): 536–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G., K. Dobney, U. Albarella, M. Fang, E. Matisoo-Smith, J. Robins, S. Lowden, H. Finlayson, T. Brand, E. Willerslev, P. Rowley-Conwy, L. Andersson &A. Cooper. 2005. Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication. Science 307(5715): 1618–1621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. 2005. Controlling garlic mustard: an integrated approach. Cornell Plantations Notes 83: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. H., M. S. Dosmann, P. Del Tredici &S. Andrews. 2002. Systematic relationship of weeping katsura based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. HortScience 37(3): 595–598.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,S. Shoup &Z.D. Chen. 2005. Phylogenetics ofBetula (Betulaceae) inferred from sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Rhodora 107(929): 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lighty, R. W. 1984. Toward a more rational approach to plant collections. Longwood Program Seminars 16: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, D. U. Hooper, M. A. Huston, D. Raffaelli, B. Schmid, D. Tilman &D. A. Wardle. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294(5543): 804–808.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyal, C. H. C. &A. L. Weitzman. 2004. Taxonomy: exploring the impediment. Science 305: 1106.Mack, R.N. 2005. Predicting the identity of plant invaders: future contributions from horticulture. HortScience 40(5): 1168–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C.T. 2003. Distribution, hosts, abundance, and seasonal flight activity of the exotic leafroller,Archips fuscocupreanus Walsingham (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in the northeastern United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 96(5): 660–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, D. 1997. The economics of botanical collections. Pp. 68–82in J.R. Nudds and C.W. Pettitt (eds.), The value and valuation of natural science collections, Manchester, 1995. The Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchandeau, S., M. Guenezan &J. Chantai. 1995. Weight increase as a criterion of age in young wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Gibier Faune Sauvage 12(4): 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, E. 2006. Gardens in full bloom. Nature 440: 860–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, E. 2005. Will DNA bar codes breathe life into classification? Science 307: 1037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maunder, M., S. Higgens &A. Culham. 2001. The effectiveness of botanic garden collections in supporting plant conservation: a European case study. Biodivers. & Conservation 10(3): 383–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medbury, S. 1991. Taxonomy and garden design: a successful marriage? Public Gard. 6(3): 29–32, 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melcher, P.J., M.A. Zwieniecki &N.M. Holbrook. 2003. Vulnerability of xylem vessels to cavitation in sugar maple. Scaling from individual vessels to whole branches. Pl. Physiol. 131: 1775–1780.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michener, D. 1996. Collections as a tool, not a purpose. Public Gard. 11(2): 6, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. The hows and whys of verifying a living collection. Public Gard. 6(3): 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.H. 1963. The curator as a research worker. Curator 6(4): 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. &G. Ware. 2002. Suitability and feeding preference of selected North American, European, and Asian elm (Ulmus spp.) biotypes to elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Environm. Hort. 20(3): 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S.E., W.J. Kress &K. Samper. 2004. Crisis for biodiversity collections. Science 303(5656): 310b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J.L. &J.I. Mori. 1972. Revising our conceptions of museum research. Curator 15(3): 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murch, S.J. 2004. In vitro conservation of endangered plants in Hawaii. Biodiversity 5(1): 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature. 2006. The constant gardeners. Nature 440: 845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevling, L.I., Jr. 1984. On public understanding of museum research. Curator 27(3): 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S.H. &D. Potter. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of tribe neillieae (Rosaceae) using DNA sequences of cpDNA, rDNA, and LEAFY. Amer. J. Bot. 92(1): 179–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pai, J.G.B. &W.R. Graves. 1995. Seed source affects seedling development and nitrogen fixation ofMaackia amurensis. J. Environm. Hort. 13(3): 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekarik, A. J. 2003. Long-term thinking: what about the stuff? Curator 46(4): 367–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettitt, C. 1994. Using natural history collections. Pp. 144–166in G. Stansfield, J. Mathias & G. Reid (eds.), Manual of natural history curatorship. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfosser, M.F., J. Guzy-Wróbelska, B.-Y. Sun, T.F. Stuessy, T. Sugawara &N. Fujii. 2002. The origin of species ofAcer (Sapindaceae) endemic to Ullung Island, Korea. Syst. Bot. 27(2): 351–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pooler, M.R. &R. L. Dix. 2001. Screening ofCercis (redbud) taxa for ability to root from cuttings. J. Environm. Hort. 19(3): 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,K. A. Jacobs &M. Kramer. 2002. Differential resistance toBotryosphaeria ribis amongCercis taxa. Pl. Dis. 86(8): 880–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J., P. Arzberger, H.-W. Braun, P. Bryant, S. Gage, T. Hansen, P. Hanson, C.-C. Lin, F.-P. Lin, T. Kratz, W. Michener, S. Shapiro &T. Williams. 2005. Wireless sensor networks for ecology. BioScience 55(7): 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prather, L. A., O. Alvarez-Fuentes, M.H. Mayfleld &C. J. Ferguson. 2004. Implications of the decline in plant collecting for systematic and floristic research. Syst. Bot. 29(1): 216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primack, D., C. Imbres, R.B. Primack, A.J. Miller-Rushing &P. Del Tredici. 2004. Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston. Amer. J. Bot. 91(8): 1260–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., M. Dossman (sic) &D. Rae. 2003. The management of ‘ad hoc’ ex situ conservation status species at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. Sibbaldia 1(1): 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D.A.H. 1990. What conservation role for botanic gardens? Profess. Hort. 4: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1995. Botanic gardens and their live plant collections: present and future roles. Ph. D. diss., Univ. of Edinburgh.

  • Rankin, T.V. 1955. Arnold Arboretum controversy. Science 121(3154): 835–836.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rappe, E. &S. L. Kivelä. 2005. Effects of garden visits on long-term care residents as related to depression. HortTechnol. 15(2): 298–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P.H. 1979. Research programs in botanic gardens. Longwood Program Seminars 11: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. Research in botanical gardens. Bot. Jahrb. 102: 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. The value of living collections. Arnoldia 49(1): 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004a. Botanical gardens and the 21st Century. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 55(Suppl. 1, Article 12): 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2004b. Ex situ conservation. Public Gard. 19(3): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. Research in botanical gardens. Public Gard. 21(1): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, S. M. 2000. Development of an in ovolo embryo culture procedure forHydrangea. J. Environm. Hort. 18(1): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, S. Y. &B. Crosby. 2005. Biological databases for plant research. P1. Physiol. 138: 1–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. F. 1980. Old specimens and new directions: the museum tradition in contemporary ornithology. Auk 97: 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruedas, L.A., J. Salazar-Bravo, J.W. Dragoo &T.L. Yates. 2000. The importance of being earnest: what, if anything, constitutes a “specimen examined?” Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 17(1): 129–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi, CF. 1991. The role and nature of research at botanical gardens. Public Gard. 6(3): 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, N. D. 1965. A thousand ages: the University of Wisconsin Arboretum. Regents of the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulhof, R. 1996. Public garden landscapes: new stories to tell. Public Gard. 11(1): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinks, P.Q., G.B. Pauly, J.J. Crayon &H.B. Shaffer. 2003. Survival of the western pond turtle (Emys marmorata) in an urban California environment. Biol. Conservation 113(2): 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankowski, C. 1998. The curation crisis: can we afford the future? (4 February 2005; http://www.sfsu.edu/~museumst/minerva/stankow.html).

  • Steere, W. C. 1969. Research as a function of a botanical garden. Longwood Program Seminars 1: 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, J.J. &S.L. Greene. 1996. Proposed ecological descriptors and their utility for plant germplasm collections. Crop Sci. 36(2): 439–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M.J. &T. Eriksson. 1996. Symbioses in herbaria: recommendations for more positive interactions between plant systematists and ecologists. Taxon 45(1): 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, A.V. &N.D. Tsutsui. 2004. The value of museum collections for research and society. Bio-Science 54(1): 66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankersley, B. 2006. Plant databases linked for botanists and gardeners. Nature 441: 574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R.L. 1986. Defining and distinguishing the research and education roles of botanical gardens and arboreta from those of other institutions and organizations. Pp. 12–24in M.J. Balick (ed.), Botanical gardens and arboreta: future directions. New York Botanical Garden/American Association of Botanical Gardens and Arboreta, Swarthmore, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Research at public gardens: community benefits. Longwood Program Seminars 19: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. &K. Tripp. 1998. Ex situ conservation of conifers: a collaborative model for biodiversity preservation. Public Gard. 13(3): 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. 1997. Evaluating the earth sciences collections at the Royal Ontario Museum. Pp. 117–122in J. R. Nudds & C. W. Pettitt (eds.), The value and valuation of natural science collections, Manchester, 1995. The Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, P., R. Furstner, W. Barthlott &C. Neinhuis. 2003. Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. J. Exp. Bot. 54(385): 1295–1303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B.W. 1963. The curator as a custodian of collections. Curator 6(4): 292–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley, G. 1997. The social history value of natural history collections. Pp. 44–60in J. R. Nudds & C. W. Pettitt (eds.), The value and valuation of natural science collections, Manchester, 1995. The Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G.W., V. Heywood &W. Crowley. 1993. North American botanic gardens. Hort. Rev. 15(1): 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Q.D., P.H. Raven &E.O. Wilson. 2004. Taxonomy: impediment or expedient? Science 303: 285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widrlechner, M.P. 1997. Managerial tools for seed regeneration. P1. Var. Seeds 10: 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &L.A. Burke. 2003. Analysis of germplasm distribution patterns for collections held at the North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station, Ames, Iowa, USA. Genet. Resources Crop Evol. 50(3): 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18(2): 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winker, K. 2004. Natural history museums in a postbiodiversity era. Bioscience 54(5): 455–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D.W., M.D. Schwartz, A.N. Lakso, Y. Otsuki, R.M. Pool &N.J. Shaulis. 2005. Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA. Int. J. Biometeorol. 49(5): 303–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Association of Zoos and Aquariums. 2005. The world zoo and aquarium conservation strategy: building a future for wildlife. WAZA, Bern, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk, J.D. 1984. Confessions of a collections advocate. Longwood Program Seminars 16: 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture, Cornell University, 14850, Ithaca, NY, USA

    Michael Sean Dosmann

  2. The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, 02130, Jamaica Plain, MA, USA

    Michael Sean Dosmann

Authors
  1. Michael Sean Dosmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dosmann, M.S. Research in the garden: Averting the collections crisis. Bot. Rev 72, 207–234 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[207:RITGAT]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2006)72[207:RITGAT]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Search

Navigation